You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0367-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew W. Mathers, Christopher Hepworth, Alice L. Baillie, Jen Sloan, Hannah Jones, Marjorie Lundgren, Andrew J. Fleming, Sacha J. Mooney, Craig J. Sturrock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 63% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 28% |
| Researcher | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 37% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,032,872
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#158
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,094
of 346,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.