↓ Skip to main content

Preference and willingness to pay for traditional medicine services in rural ethnic minority community in Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preference and willingness to pay for traditional medicine services in rural ethnic minority community in Vietnam
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12906-016-1010-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bach Xuan Tran, Ngan Kim Nguyen, Lan Phuong Nguyen, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Vuong Minh Nong, Long Hoang Nguyen

Abstract

Traditional medicine (TM) still plays an important role in a number of health care systems around the world, especially across Asian and African countries. In Vietnam, however, little is known about preference for traditional medicine use. This study assessed the prevalence of use, preference, satisfaction, and willingness to pay for TM services amongst rural ethnic minority community. A cross-sectional survey in three provinces in the North and South of Vietnam. The results showed a high level of satisfaction with TM services, with more than 90 % of respondents reporting improved health status given the use of TM. Indicators for preference of TM over modern medicine are a longer distance to health station; being in an ethnic minority; being female; and having had higher service satisfaction. Although we did not have a comparison group, the high level of satisfaction with TM services is likely the result of a project targeting community health workers and the public regarding TM education and access promotion. Indeed, the community health workers are credited with relaying the information about TM more than any other sources. This suggests the importance of community health workers and community health centers in the promotion of TM use. Ethnic minority people prefer the use of traditional medicine services that supports the expansion of national programs and promotion of traditional medications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 27 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,104,973
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,447
of 3,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,217
of 397,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#32
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.