↓ Skip to main content

Advances in immunotherapy for melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advances in immunotherapy for melanoma
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12916-016-0571-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason M. Redman, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Michael B. Atkins

Abstract

In recent years, the introduction and Federal Drug Administration approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor antibodies has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. These antagonist monoclonal antibodies are capable of unleashing dormant or exhausted antitumor immunity, which has led to durable complete and partial responses in a large number of patients. Ipilimumab targets the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) receptor. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab target programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptors and have proven to be superior to ipilimumab alone. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has yielded higher response rates, greater tumor shrinkage, and longer progression-free survival than either monotherapy alone. As other promising immunotherapies for melanoma proceed through clinical trials, future goals include defining the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors as adjuvant therapy, identifying optimal combination strategies, and developing reliable predictive biomarkers to guide treatment selection for individual patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,459,816
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,628
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,529
of 411,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.