↓ Skip to main content

Coffee and tea consumption in relation to inflammation and basal glucose metabolism in a multi-ethnic Asian population: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coffee and tea consumption in relation to inflammation and basal glucose metabolism in a multi-ethnic Asian population: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salome A Rebello, Cynthia H Chen, Nasheen Naidoo, Wang Xu, Jeannette Lee, Kee Seng Chia, E Shyong Tai, Rob M van Dam

Abstract

Higher coffee consumption has been associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in cohort studies, but the physiological pathways through which coffee affects glucose metabolism are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between habitual coffee and tea consumption and glucose metabolism in a multi-ethnic Asian population and possible mediation by inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,303,139
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,261
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,549
of 111,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#28
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.