You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation study of the Chinese Early Development Instrument (CEDI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Ip, Sophia Ling Li, Nirmala Rao, Sharon Sui Ngan Ng, Winnie Wai Sim Lau, Chun Bong Chow |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,551,520
of 23,692,259 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,388
of 3,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,348
of 204,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,692,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.