You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for open tibial fractures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-014-0074-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yinchu Shao, Hongxing Zou, Shaobo Chen, Jichun Shan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 75% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,578,554
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#326
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,074
of 236,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.