You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and safety of 3D print-assisted surgery for the treatment of pilon fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-018-0976-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jianzhong Bai, Yongxiang Wang, Pei Zhang, Meiying Liu, Peian Wang, Jingcheng Wang, Yuan Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 31% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,246,056
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#123
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,481
of 344,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.