You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0599-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marko Ćurković, Andro Košec |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 32% |
| Ireland | 6 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Librarian | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2020.
All research outputs
#666,021
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#49
of 2,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,637
of 357,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.