You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of the physical activity intervention program in the PREDIMED-Plus study: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-018-0741-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helmut Schröder, Gabriela Cárdenas-Fuentes, Miguel Angel Martínez-González, Dolores Corella, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, J. Alfredo Martínez, Francisco J. Tinahones, José López Miranda, Ramon Estruch, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Fernando Arós, Ascensión Marcos, Josep A. Tur, Julia Warnberg, Lluis Serra-Majem, Vicente Martín, Clotilde Vázquez, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep Vidal, Lidia Daimiel, José Juan Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Emilio Ros, Olga Castañer, Camille Lassale, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Eva M. Asensio, Josep Basora, Laura Torres-Collado, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Itziar Abete, Estefania Toledo, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Mònica Bullo, Albert Goday, Montserrat Fitó, Jordi Salas-Salvadó |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 372 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 13% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 13% |
| Unknown | 171 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 12% |
| Unknown | 192 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,080,063
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#790
of 1,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,282
of 343,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.