You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mixed methods developmental evaluation of the CHOICE program: a relationship-centred mealtime intervention for long-term care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-018-0964-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Wu, Jill M. Morrison, Hilary Dunn-Ridgeway, Vanessa Vucea, Sabrina Iuglio, Heather Keller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,383,287
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#609
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,104
of 349,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#25
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.