You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): an international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0831-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Seers, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Karen Cox, Nicola Crichton, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Ann Catrine Eldh, Carole A. Estabrooks, Gill Harvey, Claire Hawkes, Carys Jones, Alison Kitson, Brendan McCormack, Christel McMullan, Carole Mockford, Theo Niessen, Paul Slater, Angie Titchen, Teatske van der Zijpp, Lars Wallin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 23% |
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| Ireland | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 43% |
| Scientists | 13 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,795,075
of 24,323,943 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#357
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,386
of 314,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.