↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of Momordica charantia Linnaeus in pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of Momordica charantia Linnaeus in pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0847-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emanuel L. Peter, Serawit Deyno, Andrew Mtewa, Félicien Mushagalusa Kasali, Prakash B. Nagendrappa, Duncan Sesaazi, Casim Umba Tolo, Patrick Engeu Ogwang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 48 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,178,823
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,039
of 2,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,223
of 348,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#46
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.