↓ Skip to main content

Unsafe abortion in rural Tanzania – the use of traditional medicine from a patient and a provider perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unsafe abortion in rural Tanzania – the use of traditional medicine from a patient and a provider perspective
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12884-014-0419-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vibeke Rasch, Pernille H Sørensen, Anna R Wang, Flora Tibazarwa, Anna K Jäger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 23%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 43 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 24%
Social Sciences 24 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 8%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 45 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,631,076
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,539
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,333
of 354,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#30
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.