You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Importance of operator training and rest perfusion on the diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0493-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriana D. M. Villa, Laura Corsinovi, Ioannis Ntalas, Xenios Milidonis, Cian Scannell, Gabriella Di Giovine, Nicholas Child, Catarina Ferreira, Muhummad Sohaib Nazir, Julia Karady, Esmeralda Eshja, Viola De Francesco, Nuno Bettencourt, Andreas Schuster, Tevfik F. Ismail, Reza Razavi, Amedeo Chiribiri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 27% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,128,935
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#77
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,510
of 449,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.