↓ Skip to main content

Experimental comparisons of passive and powered ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with limb reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental comparisons of passive and powered ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with limb reconstruction
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12984-018-0455-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Russell Esposito, Kelly A. Schmidtbauer, Jason M. Wilken

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 58 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 67 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,817,996
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#559
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,940
of 437,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.