You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Jaenisch, Kim Hendrickx, Martin Erpicum, Liane Agulto, Kay M. Tomashek, Walla Dempsey, João Bosco Siqueira, Morgan A. Marks, Michael P. Fay, Catherine Laughlin, Maina L’Azou, Yee-Sin Leo, Federico Narvaez, Remy Teyssou, Stephen J. Thomas, Hasitha Tissera, Derek Wallace, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Duane J. Gubler, M. Cristina Cassetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Librarian | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,657,639
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,757
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,195
of 343,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#67
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.