↓ Skip to main content

Did an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis facilitate the establishment of primary plastids?

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Did an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis facilitate the establishment of primary plastids?
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinling Huang, Johann Peter Gogarten

Abstract

Ancient endosymbioses are responsible for the origins of mitochondria and plastids, and they contribute to the divergence of several major eukaryotic groups. Although chlamydiae, a group of obligate intracellular bacteria, are not found in plants, an unexpected number of chlamydial genes are most similar to plant homologs, which, interestingly, often contain a plastid-targeting signal. This observation has prompted several hypotheses, including gene transfer between chlamydiae and plant-related groups and an ancestral relationship between chlamydiae and cyanobacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Canada 3 2%
Czechia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 118 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Professor 17 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,115,106
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,779
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,523
of 82,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.