↓ Skip to main content

Tools for efficient epistasis detection in genome-wide association study

Overview of attention for article published in Source Code for Biology and Medicine, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools for efficient epistasis detection in genome-wide association study
Published in
Source Code for Biology and Medicine, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1751-0473-6-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiang Zhang, Shunping Huang, Fei Zou, Wei Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 43%
Computer Science 7 13%
Mathematics 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,438,457
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#102
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,535
of 180,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them