You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Point-of-care ultrasound-guided cannulation versus standard cannulation in haemodialysis vascular access: protocol for a controlled random order crossover pilot and feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0370-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica L. Schoch, Judy Currey, Liliana Orellana, Paul N. Bennett, Vicki Smith, Alison M. Hutchinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Georgia | 1 | 9% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,472,686
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#277
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,880
of 448,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.