↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Comparison of codon usage measures and their applicability in prediction of microbial gene expressivity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Comparison of codon usage measures and their applicability in prediction of microbial gene expressivity
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-11-463
Authors

Fran Supek, Kristian Vlahoviček

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,834,976
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,046
of 7,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,334
of 85,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#41
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.