↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the effect of risk factors on rates of obstetric transfusion over time using two methodological approaches

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the effect of risk factors on rates of obstetric transfusion over time using two methodological approaches
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0595-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward Jegasothy, Jillian Patterson, Deborah Randall, Tanya A. Nippita, Judy M. Simpson, David O. Irving, Jane B. Ford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Computer Science 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,542,814
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,897
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,340
of 310,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#70
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.