↓ Skip to main content

More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-6-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne E Lally, Madeleine J Murtagh, Sheila Macphail, Richard Thomson

Abstract

Childbirth is one of the most painful events that a woman is likely to experience, the multi-dimensional aspect and intensity of which far exceeds disease conditions. A woman's lack of knowledge about the risks and benefits of the various methods of pain relief can heighten anxiety. Women are increasingly expected, and are expecting, to participate in decisions about their healthcare. Involvement should allow women to make better-informed decisions; the National Institute for Clinical Excellence has stated that we need effective ways of supporting pregnant women in making informed decisions during labour. Our aim was to systematically review the empirical literature on women's expectations and experiences of pain and pain relief during labour, as well as their involvement in the decision-making process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 302 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 13%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 81 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 17%
Psychology 28 9%
Social Sciences 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 84 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,521,817
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,585
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,783
of 99,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.