↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13287-016-0449-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vaibhav Shinde, Sureshkumar Perumal Srinivasan, Margit Henry, Tamara Rotshteyn, Jürgen Hescheler, Jörg Rahnenführer, Marianna Grinberg, Johannes Meisig, Nils Blüthgen, Tanja Waldmann, Marcel Leist, Jan Georg Hengstler, Agapios Sachinidis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,472,072
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,733
of 2,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,991
of 421,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.