You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elasto-inertial microfluidics for bacteria separation from whole blood for sepsis diagnostics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-016-0235-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhammad Asim Faridi, Harisha Ramachandraiah, Indradumna Banerjee, Sahar Ardabili, Sergey Zelenin, Aman Russom |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 43 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,685,746
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#54
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,622
of 432,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them