You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What spatially explicit quantitative evidence exists that shows the effect of land tenure on illegal hunting of endangered terrestrial mammals in sub-Saharan Africa? A systematic map protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0139-x |
Authors |
Isla Duporge, Timothy Hodgetts, Maria Brett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
South Africa | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 10 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,335,267
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#196
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,853
of 437,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.