↓ Skip to main content

Response to Martin and colleagues: mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to Martin and colleagues: mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells
Published in
Biology Direct, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13062-018-0228-3
Authors

Michael Lynch, Georgi K. Marinov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Unspecified 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,747,479
of 23,801,276 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#195
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,045
of 441,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,801,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them