You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A preliminary review of studies on adaptogens: comparison of their bioactivity in TCM with that of ginseng-like herbs used worldwide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13020-018-0214-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lian-ying Liao, Yi-fan He, Li Li, Hong Meng, Yin-mao Dong, Fan Yi, Pei-gen Xiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 325. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#103,903
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#3
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,817
of 337,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them