↓ Skip to main content

Gender-related differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and their correlates in urban Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender-related differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and their correlates in urban Tanzania
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-9-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina A Njelekela, Rose Mpembeni, Alfa Muhihi, Nuru L Mligiliche, Donna Spiegelman, Ellen Hertzmark, Enju Liu, Julia L Finkelstein, Wafaie W Fawzi, Walter C Willett, Jacob Mtabaji

Abstract

Urban areas in Africa suffer a serious problem with dual burden of infectious diseases and emerging chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and diabetes which pose a serious threat to population health and health care resources. However in East Africa, there is limited literature in this research area. The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and their correlates among adults in Temeke, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Results of this study will help inform future research and potential preventive and therapeutic interventions against such chronic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 312 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 19%
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Student > Postgraduate 38 12%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 69 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 11%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 77 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,278,430
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#300
of 1,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,050
of 96,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.