↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aníbal Báez-Suárez, Estela Martín-Castillo, Josué García-Andújar, José Ángel García-Hernández, María P. Quintana-Montesdeoca, Juan Francisco Loro-Ferrer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 4%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 108 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 58 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 113 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,798,753
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#710
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,090
of 449,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them