You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol combination therapy compared to tiotropium monotherapy among symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-015-0048-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yogesh Suresh Punekar, Graeme Roberts, Afisi Ismaila, Martin O’Leary |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 30% |
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,580,144
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#226
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,667
of 390,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.