↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol combination therapy compared to tiotropium monotherapy among symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol combination therapy compared to tiotropium monotherapy among symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the UK
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12962-015-0048-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yogesh Suresh Punekar, Graeme Roberts, Afisi Ismaila, Martin O’Leary

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 30%
Researcher 7 23%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,611,902
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#180
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,721
of 396,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.