You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of suction and inner-stylet of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12890-018-0751-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoxiao Lin, Min Ye, Yuping Li, Jing Ren, Qiyan Lou, Yangyang Li, Xiaohui Jin, Ko-Pen Wang, Chengshui Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 20% |
Japan | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,522,623
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#588
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,617
of 436,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.