↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 1997
DOI 10.1186/cc110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giorgio Conti, Massimo Antonelli, Silvia Arzano, Alessandro Gasparetto

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 15 38%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,304,609
of 18,593,253 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,960
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,743
of 403,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#249
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,593,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.