You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-018-1004-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pei Lu, Ting Pan, Teng Dai, Gang Chen, Ke-qin Shi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,246,924
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#123
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,535
of 437,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.