↓ Skip to main content

Point-of-care testing for procalcitonin in identifying bacterial infections in young infants: a diagnostic accuracy study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Point-of-care testing for procalcitonin in identifying bacterial infections in young infants: a diagnostic accuracy study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12887-018-1349-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Waterfield, Julie-Ann Maney, Martin Hanna, Derek Fairley, Michael D. Shields

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,681,901
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#181
of 3,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,299
of 450,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.