You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deconstructing knowledge brokering for commissioned rapid reviews: an observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0389-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Moore, S. Redman, P. Butow, A. Haynes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Ireland | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,669,520
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#391
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,175
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#25
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.