You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The ups and downs of biological timers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, June 2005
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-2-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noa Rappaport, Shay Winter, Naama Barkai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Israel | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,503,049
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#168
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,501
of 57,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.