You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients: a comparison between the RIFLE and the Acute Kidney Injury Network classifications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc6997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José António Lopes, Paulo Fernandes, Sofia Jorge, Sara Gonçalves, António Alvarez, Zélia Costa e Silva, Carlos França, Mateus Martins Prata |
| Abstract |
Whether discernible advantages in terms of sensitivity and specificity exist with Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria versus Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Kidney Function, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) criteria is currently unknown. We evaluated the incidence of acute kidney injury and compared the ability of the maximum RIFLE and of the maximum AKIN within intensive care unit hospitalization in predicting inhospital mortality of critically ill patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 166 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 48 | 26% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 74% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,138,373
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,599
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,769
of 95,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.