You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the computational modeling of the innate immune system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s6-s7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre Bittencourt Pigozzo, Gilson Costa Macedo, Rodrigo Weber dos Santos, Marcelo Lobosco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,482,720
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,626
of 7,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,016
of 198,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#30
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.