You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imaging glial activation in patients with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms: a pilot study using [11C]DPA-713 PET
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12974-018-1381-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. Coughlin, Ting Yang, Alison W. Rebman, Kathleen T. Bechtold, Yong Du, William B. Mathews, Wojciech G. Lesniak, Erica A. Mihm, Sarah M. Frey, Erica S. Marshall, Hailey B. Rosenthal, Tristan A. Reekie, Michael Kassiou, Robert F. Dannals, Mark J. Soloski, John N. Aucott, Martin G. Pomper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| France | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 80% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 25% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 383. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#80,499
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#5
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,563
of 448,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.