↓ Skip to main content

Negotiating excess treatment costs in a clinical research trial: the good, the bad and the innovative

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negotiating excess treatment costs in a clinical research trial: the good, the bad and the innovative
Published in
Trials, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1208-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Palmer, Madeleine Harrison, Elizabeth Cross, Pam Enderby

Abstract

Barriers to recovering the excess treatment costs associated with health research from local organisations in the United Kingdom can increase research costs, delay completion of high- quality studies and risk disenfranchising health trusts and patients from participation. The authors demonstrate how the process for recovering excess treatment costs at a local National Health Service (NHS) trust level in a multicentre study was inconsistent and resulted in excess effort and cost to the research budget. An innovative example of how an organisation acting as a broker between commissioners and researchers facilitated a more timely excess treatment cost agreement is highlighted. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68798818 , registered on 18 February 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%