You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lessons learnt from implementing community engagement interventions in mobile hard-to-reach (HTR) projects in Nigeria, 2014–2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6193-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kulchumi Isa Hammanyero, Samuel Bawa, Fiona Braka, Bassey Enya Bassey, Akinola Fatiregun, Charity Warigon, Yared G. Yehualashet, Sisay Gashu Tegene, Richard Banda, Charles Korir, Tesfaye Bedada Erbeto, Martin Chukwuji, Pascal Mkanda, Usman Saidu Adamu, Peter Nsubuga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,661,637
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,041
of 15,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,760
of 436,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#257
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.