↓ Skip to main content

International medical students’ expectations and worries at the beginning of their medical education: a qualitative focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International medical students’ expectations and worries at the beginning of their medical education: a qualitative focus group study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0549-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Huhn, Julia Huber, Franziska M. Ippen, Wolfgang Eckart, Florian Junne, Stephan Zipfel, Wolfgang Herzog, Christoph Nikendei

Abstract

The number of international students has increased substantially within the last decade. Due to cultural barriers, this specific group faces diverse challenges. In comparison to German colleagues, international medical students perform significantly lower in clinical examinations and exceed the average duration of study; they suffer from personal distress as well as insufficient support. Within the present study, their individual perspectives, expectations, hopes and fears were examined. Four focus groups with first-year international medical students (N = 16) were conducted in October 2013. Each 60- to 90-min discussion was audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using qualitative methods. International medical students go abroad in search of good study-conditions. For the choice of place of study, affordability, social ties as well as an educational system following the achievement principle are decisive factors. While contact with German-students and other international students is seen as beneficial, international medical students are most concerned to encounter problems and social exclusion due to language deficits and intercultural differences. Facilitating the access to university places, the provision of financial aid and, moreover, social support, nurturing cultural integration, would greatly benefit international medical students. Hereby, the establishment of specific medical language courses as well as programs fostering intercultural-relations could prove to be valuable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 40 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,282
of 4,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,319
of 406,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#73
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.