You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of pathogens in culture-negative infective endocarditis cases by metagenomic analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12941-018-0294-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Cheng, Huan Hu, Yue Kang, Weizhi Chen, Wei Fang, Kaijuan Wang, Qian Zhang, Aisi Fu, Shuilian Zhou, Chen Cheng, Qingqing Cao, Feiyan Wang, Shela Lee, Zhou |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 22% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,464,660
of 23,778,637 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#122
of 630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,590
of 439,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,778,637 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.