You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biogeography of the Phalaenopsis amabilis species complex inferred from nuclear and plastid DNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12870-015-0560-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chi-Chu Tsai, Chang-Hung Chou, Hao-Ven Wang, Ya-Zhu Ko, Tzen-Yuh Chiang, Yu-Chung Chiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,581,674
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#637
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,247
of 238,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.