↓ Skip to main content

The control of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell survival

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The control of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell survival
Published in
Biology Direct, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-3-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pandiyan, Pushpa, Lenardo, Michael J, Pushpa Pandiyan, Michael J Lenardo

Abstract

CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells are believed to play an important role in suppressing autoimmunity and maintaining peripheral tolerance. How their survival is regulated in the periphery is less clear. Here we show that Treg cells express receptors for gamma chain cytokines and are dependent on an exogenous supply of these cytokines to overcome cytokine withdrawal apoptosis in vitro. This result was validated in vivo by the accumulation of Treg cells in Bim-/- and Bcl-2 tg mice which have arrested cytokine deprivation apoptosis. We also found that CD25 and Foxp3 expression were down-regulated in the absence of these cytokines. CD25+ cells from Scurfy mice do not depend on cytokines for survival demonstrating that Foxp3 increases their dependence on cytokines by suppressing cytokine production in Treg cells. Our study reveals that the survival of Treg cells is strictly dependent on cytokines and cytokine producing cells because they do not produce cytokines. Our study thus, demonstrates that different gamma chain cytokines regulate Treg homeostasis in the periphery by differentially regulating survival and proliferation. These findings may shed light on ways to manipulate Treg cells that could be utilized for their therapeutic applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 37%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2008.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#369
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,453
of 79,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.