You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A rapid and robust method for simultaneously measuring changes in the phytohormones ABA, JA and SA in plants following biotic and abiotic stress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-4-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Forcat, Mark H Bennett, John W Mansfield, Murray R Grant |
| Abstract |
We describe an efficient method for the rapid quantitative determination of the abundance of three acidic plant hormones from a single crude extract directly by LC/MS/MS. The method exploits the sensitivity of MS and uses multiple reaction monitoring and isotopically labelled samples to quantify the phytohormones abscisic acid, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid in Arabidopsis leaf tissue. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 535 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 158 | 28% |
| Researcher | 118 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 86 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 361 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Unknown | 84 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2008.
All research outputs
#17,916,870
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#980
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,692
of 99,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them