↓ Skip to main content

Improving the wellbeing and resilience of health services staff via psychological skills training

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the wellbeing and resilience of health services staff via psychological skills training
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13104-018-4034-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joep van Agteren, Matthew Iasiello, Laura Lo

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 33 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,581,674
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,252
of 4,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,007
of 436,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#37
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.