↓ Skip to main content

Does the timing of parental migration matter for child growth? A life course study on left-behind children in rural China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the timing of parental migration matter for child growth? A life course study on left-behind children in rural China
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nan Zhang, Laia Bécares, Tarani Chandola

Abstract

China's unprecedented internal migration has left 61 million rural children living apart from parents. This study investigates how being left behind is associated with children's growth, by examining children's height and weight trajectories by age, testing the accumulation and critical period life course hypotheses. Data were drawn from five waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Multiple cohorts of children under 6 years old from 1997-2009 were examined (N = 2,555). Growth curve models investigated whether height and weight trajectories differ for children who were left behind at different stages of the life course: in early childhood (from ages 0-5 but not afterwards), in later childhood (from ages 6 to 17 only), and in both early and later childhood (from ages 0-5 and from ages 6-17), compared to their peers from intact households. Boys who were left behind at different life stages of childhood differed in height and weight growth compared with boys from intact families. No significant associations were found for girls. As young boys turned into adolescents, those left behind in early childhood tended to have slower height growth and weight gain than their peers from intact households. There was a 2.8 cm difference in the predicted heights of boys who were left behind in early childhood compared to boys from intact households, by the age of 14. Similarly, the difference in weight between the two groups of boys was 5.3 kg by the age of 14. Being left behind during early childhood, as compared to not being left behind, could lead to slower growth rates of height and weight for boys. The life course approach adopted in this study suggests that early childhood is a critical period of children's growth in later life, especially for boys who are left behind. The gender paradox in China, where sons are preferred, but being left behind appears to affect boys more than girls, needs further exploration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Psychology 13 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 26 27%