↓ Skip to main content

Thrombocytopenia in neonates and the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombocytopenia in neonates and the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-11-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeannette S von Lindern, Tjitske van den Bruele, Enrico Lopriore, Frans J Walther

Abstract

The overall prevalence of thrombocytopenia in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units ranges from 22 to 35%. There are only a few small studies that outline the relationship between the severity of thrombocytopenia and the risk of bleeding. This makes it difficult to form an evidence-based threshold for platelet transfusions in neonatal patients. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of thrombocytopenia in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit and to study the relation between thrombocytopenia and the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 26 30%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,284,569
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,637
of 2,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,225
of 183,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.