You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A method for discovering and inferring appropriate eligibility criteria in clinical trial protocols without labeled data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s1-s6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angelo Restificar, Ioannis Korkontzelos, Sophia Ananiadou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
Researcher | 7 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 12 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,039,534
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#804
of 2,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,252
of 203,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.